Bond Indentures and Covenants

Bond Indentures and Covenants

A bond indenture is a legal contract that outlines the bond issuer’s obligations and bondholders’ rights. It is also known as a trust deed, and in regions like the United States and Canada, it’s often referred to as the bond indenture. This contract lays the groundwork for all subsequent transactions between the bondholder and the issuer. Beyond defining the issuer’s obligations and restrictions, the bond indenture also details the bond’s features. It pinpoints the issuer’s sources of repayment, commitments made to bondholders, and provisions that enhance the issuer’s capacity to fulfill its debt obligations in full.

Sources of Repayment

Repayment sources for bonds differ based on the issuer. National governments often leverage their sovereign right to tax economic activities. In contrast, local or regional governments might derive repayment funds from taxation or fees associated with infrastructure projects. Corporate bond investors predominantly depend on the firm’s operating cash flows. Meanwhile, Asset-backed securities (ABS) are anchored in the cash flows generated from a collection of loans or receivables held by a designated special-purpose issuer.

Bond Covenants

Covenants are provisions in the bond indenture. They are legally enforceable rules that borrowers and lenders agree upon when a bond is issued.

Negative Covenants (Restrictions)

Negative covenants, often referred to as restrictions, primarily aim to safeguard the interests of bondholders. They act as preventive measures, ensuring that the issuing firm refrains from actions that could escalate the risk of default. Examples of such covenants include restrictions on asset sales, negative pledges of collateral, limitations on further borrowings, and constraints on investments, disposal of assets, or the issuance of debt that is senior to existing obligations.

Affirmative Covenants (Promises)

Affirmative covenants, also known as promises, involve commitments that the borrower pledges to fulfill. Unlike negative covenants, these typically don’t restrict the issuer’s day-to-day decisions. Examples include making timely interest and principal payments to bondholders, maintaining assets, complying with laws and regulations, using bond proceeds appropriately, providing financial reports promptly, allowing bondholders the option to redeem bonds at a premium during an acquisition, and including clauses like pari passu, ensuring equal treatment of debt obligations. Another significant affirmative covenant is the cross-default clause, indicating a default if the issuer defaults on any other debt obligation.

Contrasting Affirmative and Negative Covenants

Affirmative Covenants are actions that the borrower promises to perform. They are typically administrative in nature and do not usually impose additional costs on an issuer nor materially constrain the issuer’s discretion in operating its business. On the other hand, negative covenants are prohibitions on the borrower. They are designed to protect bondholders by preventing the issuer from taking certain actions that might increase the risk of default. However, they should not be so restrictive that they hinder the issuer from capitalizing on opportunities or adapting to changing business circumstances.

Question #1

  1. To specify the bond’s features and identify the issuer’s sources of repayment.
  2. To provide a detailed history of the issuer’s past financial performance.
  3. To outline the voting rights of bondholders in the issuer’s annual general meeting.

Question #2

  1. Operating cash flows of the firm for corporate bonds.
  2. Fees from infrastructure projects for local governments.
  3. Dividends from equity shares.

Question #3

  1. To specify actions that the borrower promises to perform.
  2. To ensure that an issuer maintains the ability to make interest and principal payments.
  3. To provide bondholders with voting rights in the issuer’s decisions.